Thursday, January 15, 2015
2014 NCAA FBS Competitive Balance
Now that the 2014 season is in the books, I want to take a short look at competitive balance in NCAA football. For more background read my previous analysis of competitive balance in NCAA football. What I want to do in this blog is simply update the data over the past two seasons in terms of competitive balance. Using the Noll-Scully measure of competitive balance, I find that NCAA football was 1.43 in 2014, which is more balanced than the 1.65 in 2013. Yet, overall, NCAA football does not seem to be much different in terms of competitive balance from year to year as you can see in the table that I give in the blog linked above.
Wednesday, January 14, 2015
2014 NCAA FBS Final Ranking
Ohio State is the winner of the first bowl subdivision championship game! So now that all of the post season football games are finished, I have run the Complex Invasion College Football Production Model one last time for this season using the data from cfbstats.com. Unlike the last few years, where the team ranked the highest in the model was also the "National Champion", this season Ohio State ranks as the #4 most productive team behind #1 Texas Christian, #2 Oregon (the runner-up in the championship game) and #3 Michigan State. The highest ranked SEC team is #7 Alabama.
Previous 2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 Rankings
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 16
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 15
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 14
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 13
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 12
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 11
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 10
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 9
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 8
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 7
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 6
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 5
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 4
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 3
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 2
| Rank | Team |
| 1 | TCU |
| 2 | Oregon |
| 3 | Michigan State |
| 4 | Ohio State |
| 5 | Marshall |
| 6 | Baylor |
| 7 | Alabama |
| 8 | Georgia |
| 9 | Louisiana Tech |
| 10 | Wisconsin |
| 11 | Clemson |
| 12 | Memphis |
| 13 | Boise State |
| 14 | East Carolina |
| 15 | Georgia Tech |
| 16 | Mississippi |
| 17 | Georgia Southern |
| 18 | Mississippi State |
| 19 | Louisville |
| 20 | Stanford |
| 21 | BYU |
| 22 | Arkansas |
| 23 | Northern Illinois |
| 24 | Houston |
| 25 | North Carolina State |
Previous 2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 Rankings
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 16
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 15
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 14
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 13
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 12
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 11
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 10
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 9
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 8
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 7
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 6
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 5
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 4
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 3
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 2
Wednesday, December 31, 2014
2014 NFL Payroll and Performance
With the NFL regular season in the books, let me turn my attention to the relationship between team payrolls and team performance. As we discuss in our book The Wages of Wins, while there tends to be a positive and statistically significant relationship between relative payroll and team performance, the relationship is not really very large enough to conclude that spending by teams is related to on-field performance. While the book was published in 2006 (and updated in 2007), I like to try to keep up to date on these topics and thus the reason for this blog post.
So, I downloaded the NFL regular season team standings data and NFL team payroll data to run this analysis for just the 2014 season. Before I present the results, I want to discuss the payroll data. Using the link above you can see that I am using "cash" and not there salary cap option. The reason is that I want to focus on actual spending by the team on the players as opposed to how money is attributed to payroll regulations. For those interested in doing this on there own, here is a step-by-step guide to payroll and performance analysis in Microsoft Excel.
So for the 2014 NFL regular season team payroll and performance is positive and statistically significant, but the amount that payroll explains team performance is about 25%. Meaning that there is 75% unexplained. If I wanted to know why teams wins, using only payroll seems to be a limited resource.
So, I downloaded the NFL regular season team standings data and NFL team payroll data to run this analysis for just the 2014 season. Before I present the results, I want to discuss the payroll data. Using the link above you can see that I am using "cash" and not there salary cap option. The reason is that I want to focus on actual spending by the team on the players as opposed to how money is attributed to payroll regulations. For those interested in doing this on there own, here is a step-by-step guide to payroll and performance analysis in Microsoft Excel.
So for the 2014 NFL regular season team payroll and performance is positive and statistically significant, but the amount that payroll explains team performance is about 25%. Meaning that there is 75% unexplained. If I wanted to know why teams wins, using only payroll seems to be a limited resource.
Labels:
NFL,
Payroll Analysis
Monday, December 29, 2014
NFL Competitive Balance 2014
Now that the NFL regular season is wrapped up, it is time to take a look
at how competitively balanced the NFL was last season. In order to do
this, I am going to look at the NFL season statistically as a sample and
as a population - mainly for comparison purposes. Additionally, I will
take a look at the conferences separately in terms of competitive
balance. The data comes from profootball-reference.com.
There are a lot of ways to measure competitive balance, and I have chosen to use a simple measure called the Noll-Scully Competitive balance measure. By competitive balance we are looking at how well a league's standings are in relation to a league where wins and losses are determined randomly. Here is a step-by-step guide if you want to calculate this on your own. As a reference, here is the Noll-Scully using a sample or a population for the NFL from 1981 to 2012.
For the NFL in 2014 the Noll-Scully was 1.562 (population) and 1.587 (sample). If you click on the link in the last sentence above, you will notice that the NFL's competitive balance for this past season is very similar to recent seasons.
Since the 2000 NFL season, competitive balance in the NFL has been fairly stable as shown below:
There are a lot of ways to measure competitive balance, and I have chosen to use a simple measure called the Noll-Scully Competitive balance measure. By competitive balance we are looking at how well a league's standings are in relation to a league where wins and losses are determined randomly. Here is a step-by-step guide if you want to calculate this on your own. As a reference, here is the Noll-Scully using a sample or a population for the NFL from 1981 to 2012.
For the NFL in 2014 the Noll-Scully was 1.562 (population) and 1.587 (sample). If you click on the link in the last sentence above, you will notice that the NFL's competitive balance for this past season is very similar to recent seasons.
Since the 2000 NFL season, competitive balance in the NFL has been fairly stable as shown below:
Monday, December 15, 2014
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 16
With only one game this past weekend, it may not matter much whether this game is included in the overall dataset, but I thought that I would be through as I have been in the past so I have included the latest rankings after the Army-Navy game. So using the data from cfbstats.com here is the last regular season ranking for 2014. As you can see the ranking is similar to the previous week's ranking, with Oregon still the most productive team in all of college football. So here is the final regular season top 25 using the Complex Invasion College Football Production Model.
Previous 2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 Rankings
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 15
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 14
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 13
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 12
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 11
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 10
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 9
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 8
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 7
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 6
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 5
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 4
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 3
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 2
| Rank | Team |
| 1 | Oregon |
| 2 | Marshall |
| 3 | TCU |
| 4 | Baylor |
| 5 | Ohio State |
| 6 | Michigan State |
| 7 | Alabama |
| 8 | Georgia |
| 9 | Louisiana Tech |
| 10 | Boise State |
| 11 | Mississippi State |
| 12 | Georgia Southern |
| 13 | Georgia Tech |
| 14 | Northern Illinois |
| 15 | Wisconsin |
| 16 | East Carolina |
| 17 | Mississippi |
| 18 | Memphis |
| 19 | Florida State |
| 20 | BYU |
| 21 | Arizona |
| 22 | Cincinnati |
| 23 | Oklahoma |
| 24 | USC |
| 25 | Western Kentucky |
Previous 2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 Rankings
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 15
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 14
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 13
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 12
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 11
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 10
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 9
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 8
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 7
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 6
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 5
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 4
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 3
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 2
Monday, December 8, 2014
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 15
The college football regular season has now finished week 15. As you
can see the Oregon Ducks are the most productive team in all of college football using the Complex Invasion College Football Production Model using data from cfbstats.com.
Of the top 4, the model only has one of those chosen by the College Football Playoff committee - Oregon. Ohio State is #5, Alabama is #7 and Florida State is #19 in terms of overall productivity.
Here is the Top 25.
Previous 2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 Rankings
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 14
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 13
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 12
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 11
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 10
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 9
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 8
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 7
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 6
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 5
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 4
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 3
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 2
Of the top 4, the model only has one of those chosen by the College Football Playoff committee - Oregon. Ohio State is #5, Alabama is #7 and Florida State is #19 in terms of overall productivity.
Here is the Top 25.
| Rank | Team |
| 1 | Oregon |
| 2 | Marshall |
| 3 | TCU |
| 4 | Baylor |
| 5 | Ohio State |
| 6 | Michigan State |
| 7 | Alabama |
| 8 | Georgia |
| 9 | Louisiana Tech |
| 10 | Boise State |
| 11 | Mississippi State |
| 12 | Georgia Southern |
| 13 | Georgia Tech |
| 14 | Northern Illinois |
| 15 | Mississippi |
| 16 | Wisconsin |
| 17 | East Carolina |
| 18 | Memphis |
| 19 | Florida State |
| 20 | BYU |
| 21 | Arizona |
| 22 | Cincinnati |
| 23 | Oklahoma |
| 24 | USC |
| 25 | Western Kentucky |
Previous 2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 Rankings
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 14
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 13
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 12
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 11
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 10
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 9
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 8
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 7
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 6
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 5
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 4
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 3
2014 NCAA FBS Top 25 for Week 2
Friday, December 5, 2014
Jim McElwain Departs Colorado State for Florida
Jim McElwain has quit as head football coach at Colorado State to take the same position at Florida. The chart below shows the Colorado State Rams production rank while both Steve Fairchild (2008-2011) and Jim McElwain (2012-2014) were at the helm of the program, with the vertical lines representing coaching changes. After the chart below is some more details during McElwain's time as the head football coach at Colorado State.
Jim McElwain [2012-2014]
2012
The Rams finished the regular season at 4-8 making them post-season bowl ineligible. The Rams played
against an “average” strength of schedule (SOS). Colorado State's best
win was against #96 ranked New Mexico by a score of (24-20) and their worst
regular season loss was to FCS North Dakota State by a
score of (7-22). Colorado State was the
#98 ranked team overall, with the #97 ranked
offense and the #70 ranked defense using the Complex Invasion College Football Production Model from the data provided by www.cfbstats.com.2013
The Rams finished the regular season at 7-6 making them post-season bowl eligible, where they defeated #81 ranked Washington State by a score of (48-45) to finish the season with a won-loss record of 8-6. The Rams played
against an “easier” strength of schedule
(SOS), meaning that their SOS was between one standard and two standard
deviations higher than the average SOS for the "league". Colorado State's best regular season win
was against #75 ranked Wyoming by a
score of (52-22) and their worst regular season loss was to #106 ranked Tulsa by a
score of (27-30). Colorado State was the #37 ranked team overall, with the #17 ranked
offense and the #91 ranked defense from the Complex Invasion College Football Production Model using data provided by www.cfbstats.com.
At the time of McElwain's departure to Florida, the Rams were 10-2. The Rams played
against an “easier” strength of schedule
(SOS). Colorado State's best regular season win
was against #34 ranked Utah State by a
score of (16-13) and their worst regular season loss was to #56 ranked Air Force by a
score of (24-27). Colorado State was the #28 ranked team overall, with the #23 ranked
offense and the #54 ranked defense from the Complex Invasion College Football Production Model using data provided by www.cfbstats.com.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
